Paternity testing can come too late
Don't waste time wondering whether a paternity test is needed to determine the father of that newborn. If anyone has any doubts, there are important legal reasons to swallow your pride, perhaps even offend the in-laws, and have the test performed.
The law in Pennsylvania is clear: If a man acts like a child's father, and acts in a responsbile manner, he can be penalized for doing the right thing if eventually it is learned the child is not his.
A perfect example is a young man named Damoun Lopez, of Philadelphia. Mr. Lopez is on the hook for 18 years of child support even though the child in question is not his daughter and he has never married the girl's mother.
How did this happen?
Mr. Lopez suspected the child was not his even before the girl was born June 7, 2003. He asked for a blood test, but never pushed hard on the request and it never was performed. His name was placed on the birth certificate. By the time the child was 2 years old it was clear from looking at the child that the girl was not his daughter.
When he finally demanded a DNA paternity test, it confirmed his fears. The baby was not his daughter.
Too late, the court said.
Mr. Lopez's problem was that after the child was born, Mr. Lopez by his own admission "was wrapped up" with taking "the role of father wholeheartedly. I stepped up." He developed a strengthening relationship with the baby. In fact, at one point, Mr. Lopez backed away from his request for a blood test because of "the fear of actually finding out she wasn't mine," he told the court.
Pennsylvania recognizes what's known as "the doctrine of paternity by estoppel." Simply, that means if Mr. Lopez assumed the role of father, by providing support or holding himself out as the baby's parent, then Mr. Lopez by law will not be allowed to deny parentage.
The main reason behind this doctrine is to prevent non-parents from abandoning a child after the child has come to rely and depend on their support. In addtition, as in the example of Mr. Lopez, the child often has bonded emotionally with the adult.
This doctrine is not absolute. It will not apply if the reluctant father can show he was tricked. Proving fraud by clear and convincing evidence will allow a man to avoid paternity even if, as with Mr. Lopez, the man has offered support and bonded with the child.
Fraud can be established if father can prove that mother in fact knew he was not the biological parent and in fact deceived and manipulated the man.
Labels: paternity

